%Encoding: UTF-8
@inproceedings{nowak2020chiea,
 abstract = {Traditional measuring devices separate probes from their data visualisation, requiring
the operator to switch attention between their metering and result frequently. We
explored the efficiency of four different visualisation modalities during a circuit
analysis task that utilises the output of an oscilloscope. We argue that the spatial
alignment of an oscilloscope's display and probe interferes with the cognitive processing
of data visualisations, hence increasing the probability of errors and required time.
We compared a fixed placed oscilloscope, in-situ projections, user positioned tablets,
and head-mounted display while measuring completion times, subjective workload, number
of errors, and personal preferences after each task. Results indicate that the oscilloscope
produced the lowest completion time compared to other modalities. However, visualising
data on a user positioned tablet or through in-situ projections yielded lower subjective
workload and a lower number of errors. We discuss how our work generalises for assistive
systems that support practitioners during their training in circuit analysis.},
 address = {New York, NY, USA},
 author = {Nowak, Adam and Knierim, Pascal and Romanowski, Andrzej and Schmidt, Albrecht and Kosch, Thomas},
 booktitle = {Extended Abstracts of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems},
 doi = {10.1145_3334480.3382890},
 isbn = {9781450368193},
 keywords = {augmented reality, tablet, projection, oscilloscope, head-mounted display, augmenting devices},
 location = {Honolulu, HI, USA},
 numpages = {7},
 pages = {1–7},
 publisher = {Association for Computing Machinery},
 series = {CHI EA '20},
 title = {What Does the Oscilloscope Say?: Comparing the Efficiency of In-Situ Visualisations during Circuit Analysis},
 url = {https://www.unibw.de/usable-security-and-privacy/publikationen/pdf/nowak2020chiea.pdf},
 year = {2020}
}